Last edited by Brakree
Friday, May 15, 2020 | History

8 edition of The Gault Case And Young People"s Rights found in the catalog.

The Gault Case And Young People"s Rights

Debating Supreme Court Decisions

by Laura Cohen

  • 42 Want to read
  • 8 Currently reading

Published by Enslow Publishers .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Law & Crime,
  • Juvenile Nonfiction,
  • Children"s Books/Young Adult Misc. Nonfiction,
  • Children,
  • Due process of law,
  • Juvenile justice, Administration of,
  • Juvenile literature,
  • Legal status, laws, etc,
  • United States,
  • Children: Young Adult (Gr. 7-9)

  • The Physical Object
    FormatLibrary Binding
    Number of Pages128
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL10936973M
    ISBN 100766024768
    ISBN 109780766024762
    OCLC/WorldCa63117004

    U.S. Supreme Court In re Gault, U.S. 1 () In re Gault. No. Argued December 6, Decided U.S. 1. Syllabus. Appellants' year-old son, Gerald Gault, was taken into custody as the result of a complaint that he had made lewd telephone calls. Learn In Re Gault () with free interactive flashcards. Choose from 17 different sets of In Re Gault () flashcards on Quizlet.

    Gerald Francis Gault, fifteen years old, was taken into custody for allegedly making an obscene phone call. Gault had previously been placed on probation. The police did not leave notice with Gault's parents, who were at work, when the youth was arrested.   Barry C. Feld, “In re Gault Revisited: A Cross-State Comparison of the Right to Counsel in Juvenile Court,” Crime and Delinquency, vol. 34, no. 4, October , Juvenile Justice: Procedural Safeguards for Delinquents in the Adjudicatory Author: Hannah Miller-Kim.

    7. Gerald's lawyers argued that he was deprived of his 14th Amendment rights of liberty without due process of law. This right is applied to juveniles and adults. It was not applied to . CASE BRIEFS. Login Register. Search. CHAPTER 19 Assignment, Delegation, and Third-Party Beneficiaries § INTRODUCTION During the entire course of this book, it has been emphasized that contract is a consensual relationship created by agreement between the parties. it has been taken for granted that contractual rights and duties.


Share this book
You might also like
An omnibus.

An omnibus.

The Berenstain Bears new neighbors

The Berenstain Bears new neighbors

More justice for less money

More justice for less money

Pure Lust

Pure Lust

Global Praise 1 Program and Resource Book

Global Praise 1 Program and Resource Book

The Active Eyestack/Guidebook/MacIntosh Compatible (5 Disks With Manual)

The Active Eyestack/Guidebook/MacIntosh Compatible (5 Disks With Manual)

Four Norwegian moods (1942)

Four Norwegian moods (1942)

A true and perfect account of the examination, confession, tryal, condemnation and execution of Joan Perry, and her two sons, John & Richard Perry, and for the murder of William Harrison, Gent.

A true and perfect account of the examination, confession, tryal, condemnation and execution of Joan Perry, and her two sons, John & Richard Perry, and for the murder of William Harrison, Gent.

The Wreck of the Titan

The Wreck of the Titan

Seminar publication

Seminar publication

Elementary exercises in map work

Elementary exercises in map work

Times mobile printing unit

Times mobile printing unit

intelligent agnostics introduction to Christianity

intelligent agnostics introduction to Christianity

Sister Jackie

Sister Jackie

The power of uncertainty

The power of uncertainty

The Ouachita Mountains

The Ouachita Mountains

Ballycastle Lawn Tennis Club

Ballycastle Lawn Tennis Club

The Gault Case And Young People"s Rights by Laura Cohen Download PDF EPUB FB2

Although these volumes are objectively and clearly written and would be useful for reports, two of the topics have been thoroughly covered in Thomas J.

Billitteri's The Gault Case: Legal Rights for Young People () and Sarah Betsy Fuller's Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier: Censorship in School Newspapers (, both Enslow). Even with the addition of Price: $   : The Gault Case: Legal Rights for Young People (Landmark Supreme Court Cases) (): Billitteri, Thomas J.: Books5/5(1).

Get this from a library. The Gault case and young people's rights: debating Supreme Court decisions.

[Laura Cohen] -- Discusses the case of year-old Gerald Gault, how his case made it through the courts, what the Supreme Court decided, and the impact this has had on children's rights. Download The Gault Case: Legal Rights for Young People (Landmark Supreme Court Cases) Ebook.

Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law In a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision gave juveniles accused of crimes the same due process. About The Gault Case: Legal Rights for Young People - -- A library of the most important United States Supreme Court cases Examines the issues lead author, illustrator, and publisher in the children's / young adult book industry.

Members include published authors and illustrators, librarians, agents, editors, publicists, booksellers 5/5(1). In the case of “In re Gault” it was a landmark decision, which finally gave Juveniles the same due processes of adults.

The U.S Supreme Court made this decision in after hearing the case of fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault. Facts: Gerald (“Jerry”) Gault was a 15 year-old accused of making an obscene telephone call to a neighbor, Mrs. Cook, on June 8, After Mrs. Cook filed a complaint, Gault and a friend, Ronald Lewis, were arrested and taken to the Children’s Detention Home.

Gault was on probation when he was arrested, after being in the company of another boy who had stolen a wallet from a woman’s.

In re Gault, U.S. 1 (), was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in The Court ruled that juveniles (children and teenagers) have the same rights as adults when they are accused of a example, they have due process rights, like the right to have a lawyer, when they are being questioned by the police, and when they are on case name: In re Gault et al.

When fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault of Globe, Arizona, allegedly made an obscene phone call to a neighbor, he was arrested by the local police, who failed to inform his parents.

After a hearing in which the neighbor didn’t even testify, Gault was promptly sentenced to six years in a juvenile “boot camp”—for an offense that would have cost an adult only two by: 3. Susan Dudley Gold. In re Gault ().New York, NY: Twenty-First Century Book, Thomas J.

Billitteri. The Gault Case: Legal Rights for Young : Hannah Miller-Kim. In Re Gault was a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court that ultimately established that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a juvenile involved in a delinquency hearing must be afforded similar due process rights as is afforded to an adult.

In re Gault was an impactful U.S. Supreme Court decision. Gerald “Jerry” Gault’s case established a new standard in our justice system. Margot Adler was a longtime journalist for NPR who began as a general assignment reporter in Adler’s interview with.

The case of In Re Gault started when Gerald Gault a year-old citizen of Arizona made several lewd telephone calls to a neighbor. After a complaint by that neighbor Gault was arrested and detained by police.

Gault’s parents worried that their son was not at home that day, searched for their missing child. Gault’s parents [ ]. From our pages (SeptOct/11): "A Supreme Court case marked one of the most important children's-rights cases of the 20th century, granting children some of the same rights as adults.

After year-old Gerald Gault was arrested by Globe, Arizona, police for making an obscene phone call, he was sentenced to six years in juvenile detention 4/5.

The latter occurred in this case. Young Gault was arrested and detained on a charge of violating an Arizona penal law by using vile and offensive language to a lady on the telephone.

If an adult, he [p61] could only have been fined or imprisoned for two months for his conduct. As a juvenile, however, he was put through a more or less secret. Gault’s team had timing on its side, fortunate to be in front of the liberal court of Chief Justice Earl Warren, who had pushed aggressively to expand due process rights at all levels of the.

In re Gault, U.S. 1 (), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Primary Holding was that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants.

Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges Concur/dissent: Harlan. 21st century. Modern children's rights issues in the United States include child labor laws, including many agricultural settings where young people between the ages of 14 and 18 routinely work full time jobs and receive half of the minimum wage.

Another common issue is child that make it extremely difficult for non-custodial parents to spend quality time with their children. At issue in In re Gault () was the constitutionality of juvenile court proceedings.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in its only case on point, held that juveniles have a right to notice of the charges against them as well as the rights to counsel, to confront and crossexamine witnesses, and to exercise the privilege against self-incrimination.

In In re Gault, U.S. 1 (), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth case is viewed as turning point in the constitutional rights of juveniles.

Facts of In re Gault. Gerald Gault, who was years-old, was taken into custody based on a complaint that he had made lewd telephone.It is the basic and essential term in the social compact which defines the rights of the individual and delimits the powers which the state may exercise.” For a National Public Radio piece on the Gault case, click here ( ; Debbie Elliott, host: All Things Considered from NPR News.

Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law). Making the case. Less than six months before Fortas issued the final Gault ruling, the case was argued before the Supreme Court in December A team of young, talented lawyers, led by American Civil Liberties Union attorney Ken Dorsen, made many .